Hello--
Certainly, we all now must do whatever possible to curtail
our utility costs. But, in reflection, we can easily recall the most unpleasant initial "condensing" furnaces-- i.e.- essentially all those stainless steel exchangers simply failed due to the highly corrosive condensed liquids produced.
Although these exchangers are "guaranteed for life", has anyone yet seen wherein that associated labor to remove furnace, disassemble A/C cooling coil, etc. are included as well?
Lastly, that condensate is handled if the draining system is by gravity & within a PVC ( corrosion resistant ) plumbing system. But, any installation requiring a collection sump / pump to deliver this acid from a basement furnace or an installation without a gravity drain possibility again increases the on-going (replacement) expenses.
In short, I wonder if these condensing furnaces actually do "save" any monies over the anticipated 12-15 years expectancy?? Or, would it be "economically better" just to stay with those of improved efficiencies yet NOT of the consdensing type?? everett whitney